Community Corner

Caltrain Declares Fiscal Emergency

The vote streamlines the implementation of a broad range of proposed cuts, including reducing weekday trains by half and ending weekend service.

Caltrain’s Board of Directors voted unanimously to declare a fiscal emergency today, paving the way for a far-reaching array of cuts to help bridge a projected $30 million budget gap.

The vote came after more than two hours of one-minute testimonials from riders concerned about losing Caltrain service. Their voices joined the 1,350 written comments that the board received during the four community meetings it held across the peninsula last month, according to Caltrain Executive Director Michael J. Scanlon.

While nothing is certain until the board votes on next year’s budget in April, declaring a fiscal emergency allows Caltrain to bypass the state-mandated environmental review required before making changes to their service, said Spokeswoman Christine Dunn.

Find out what's happening in Palo Altowith free, real-time updates from Patch.

“If we had to do it, we’d be bankrupt by then,” she said.

Those cuts include nearly halving the number of daily trains and eliminating both weekend service and all service south of San Jose.

Find out what's happening in Palo Altowith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Even with these measures, Caltrain would still be $5 million short of breaking even, said Michelle Bouchard, Caltrain’s director of transportation.

“This agency can’t support itself without a dedicated funding source,” Scanlon said.

Unlike other agencies that have allotted revenue through taxes, more than half of Caltrain’s funding comes from its three partner agencies: VTA, SamTrans and the County of San Francisco. Composing the so-called Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board, payment from each agency is typically proportional to the amount of riders within that county, Dunn said.

The remaining portion of its revenue comes from ticket sales, according to the presentation from Caltrain.

However, the economic downturn that has hit the coffers of most county governments has forced the three partners to reduce their amount of contribution over the past few years. SamTrans, in particular, can only afford $4.7 of its allotted $14.7 million this year, according to the presentation.

If the other agencies follow suit, Caltrain’s available funding for the coming fiscal year would have dropped from $35 million to $11 million.

“This economic instability has really hit Caltrain and its funding partners in a way that’s unprecedented,” said Bouchard.

VTA General Manager Michael T. Burns announced that the agency would not cut its own contribution in a letter last month. Some have suggested that the agency provide an additional one-time contribution to help cover SamTrans, but not everyone agrees that it would be fair to the Santa Clara County Taxpayers who pay for VTA.

“Santa Clara taxpayers should not be subsidizing the cost for San Mateo County,” said Gilroy City Councilwoman and Caltrain Citizen’s Advisory Committee member, Cat Tucker, at a community meeting last month.

Concerns expressed at the meeting were plenty: some said that they chose their homes based on a nearby station that is now in jeopardy. Some were students, some disabled, and some were simply long-time fans.

“I have been riding the train for over 80 years,” said Pat Dixon, who recalled when the system was owned by Union Pacific, “I hate to see any trains cut.”

The most numerous contingent at the meeting was a group representing the private boys high school, Bellarmine College Preparatory. Over 240 of the students commute by train every day, and nearly half of them ride from south of San Jose, according to Bellarmine Vice President for Advancement, Brian Adams.

“It’s critical to the life of our school,” he said.

The College Park station, a short walk from Bellarmine, is one of the stations being considered for the cut. The others are Bayshore, South San Francisco, San Bruno, Burlingame, Hayward Park, Belmont, San Antonio, Lawrence and Santa Clara.

Bouchard said that the agency took a pragmatic approach in considering what stations to cut. Each trip could only last 70 minutes, stopping at the most popular stations during peak hours.

co-founder Yoriko Kishimito, who was in attendance at today's meeting, said that SamTrans is largely to blame for Caltrain's woes.

"Caltrain is ironically one of the best performing agencies of the 28 transit agencies in the Bay Area," she said. "But it doesn't have dedicated funding. It has to go other agencies every year discretionary funding."

SamTrans has itself been in a fiscal crisis for the last few years, and said a year ago that this moment--when it would be unable to pay into Caltrain--would come, Kishimoto said.

For Gilroy resident and Bellarmine parent Chuck Zanger, cutting a station like College Park was puzzling.

“When I see that train unload in the evening, it’s a mob scene,” he said.

The money to be saved from each part of the proposed cuts, like ending service south of San Jose, is currently unknown, said Spokeswoman Dunn.

“It’s very difficult, when you look at a complicated service like Caltrain, to put a cost to it, because the service really functions as a whole,” she said.

Ridership in Gilroy has steadily fallen since the expansion of Highway 101 in 2003. Daily ridership at the Gilroy station peaked at 569 in 2001, experiencing a gradual decline to 119 in 2010, according to Caltrain’s annual ridership study.

When Gilroy’s Downtown Specific Plan was completed in 2006, officials expected Caltrain ridership to grow with an increasing residential population. The Valley Transportation Authority estimated there would be 2,300 commuters from the Gilroy station in 2015 and 3,000 in 2030.

Many plans drafted before the recession have been forced into question, however. Gilroy’s unemployment rose from 7 to nearly 17 percent since 2006, and recent hopeful forecasts across the country have butted against recovery-busting gas prices, according to the California Employment Development Department.

Santa Clara County has also seen a rise in unemployment, with an average of five percent more people unemployed since 2006, according to the department.

For some riders, like Morgan Hill resident Tom Gorndt, the benefit of riding Caltrain for the past ten years has been more than just transportation.

“Many people that live in Morgan Hill, Gilroy, San Martin…I would have never had the opportunity to meet them or to relate to them on a daily basis like I do on the train,” he said.

Other speakers included South San Francisco Mayor Kevin Mullin, Broadway-Burlingame Merchants Association President Ross Bruce and Sunnyvale Vice Mayor and VTA Board Member Chris Moylan.

One attendee who listened to the three-hour meeting, Bruce Shelton, has been a Caltrain Conductor for 14 years and said that he knows many riders on a first-name basis.

“It’s the only agency, hard as this is to believe, in the nine-county Bay Area without dedicated funding,” he said, “They’ve manage to cobble together the funds to keep us going in the past, but those days are behind us.”

Ridership and revenue were actually higher than expected in January, Scanlon said.

“If I could emphasize anything from this meeting–nobody on this board wants to undo everything we’ve done to increase ridership,” he said.

The Caltrain Board of Directors will meet again on April 7 to vote on the proposed changes.


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here