Local Libertarians have few kind words for Romney

Top Bay Area libertarians are skeptical about Romney’s record and distrustful of him as a voice for small government.

“Smaller, simpler government,” is a hallmark of Governor Mitt Romney’s campaign, yet for Bay Area libertarians, these words stand in contrast to Mitt Romney’s record.

“The father of Romneycare will not abolish Obamacare,” said Mark Hinkle, a former Chairman of the Libertarian Party and a candidate for State Senate in 2010.

Hinkle says that a vast majority of California libertarians will likely vote for former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, the libertarian nominee, rather than Mitt Romney, especially if Romney does not put Congressman Ron Paul on the ticket.

According to Carla Howell, Executive Director of the Libertarian Party and an opponent of Mitt Romney’s in the 2002 Massachusetts gubernatorial election, supporters of Ron Paul have no reason to support the Romney campaign.

“Mitt Romney raised taxes, raised spending, championed and initiated Romneycare, and signed into law the New England cap and trade. He is big government to the core,” said Howell.

“Mitt Romney is the opposite of Ron Paul and Gary Johnson,” Howell added.

Mountain View Vice Mayor John Inks, also an active libertarian, echoed that view.

“I see the Republicans and Democrats as both being the war and tax parties,” said Inks, who is running for re-election this year.

For now, it seems unlikely that Ron Paul will either be selected as Mitt Romney’s Vice Presidential choice or mount a third-party challenge, due to his desire to support the career of his son, Rand Paul, who is currently a US Senator from Kentucky.

“Ron Paul wants to leave a legacy to his son. Running as a third party would throw a monkey-wrench into that machine,” said Hinkle.

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook |Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Bhatman August 04, 2012 at 07:16 AM
Apparently Mitt Romney isn't sufficiently crazy to gain admission into the Ron Paul nuthouse. This leaves the door wide open for Michelle Bachman on the ticket, which sews up the tax dodging \ screaming harpie vote. To quote Clint, "Are you feeling lucky, punk"?
Jo Tog August 04, 2012 at 07:19 PM
Ron Paul is a Republican. There is a reason for that. Vote Republican. Vote for Romney 2012.
June August 04, 2012 at 08:58 PM
And there is a reason that Ron Paul won't be the Republican candidate, namely that the GOP really doesn't want capitalism, they want corporatism. The only way the GOP will ever give serious consideration to it's libertarian wing is if they feel threatened by the Libertarian Party. Vote for Gary Johnson and Jim Gray in 2012.
Jo Tog August 04, 2012 at 11:51 PM
Voting for Ron Paul is a Vote for Barack Hussein OBama. Good luck.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »